SPF Discuss (thread)
spf-draft-200404.txt -- Happy spammers,
Roger Moser,
2004/04/25
- Re: spf-draft-200404.txt -- Happy spammers, Andy Bakun, 2004/04/26
- Re: spf-draft-200404.txt -- Happy spammers, wayne, 2004/04/26
- Re: spf-draft-200404.txt -- Happy spammers, Spf Pobox, 2004/04/26
- Re: spf-draft-200404.txt -- Happy spammers, csm, 2004/04/26
- Re: spf-draft-200404.txt -- Happy spammers, spf, 2004/04/26
- Re: spf-draft-200404.txt -- Happy spammers, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/04/25
I RTFM but still have a simple ?,
PARIS ,
2004/04/24
- Re: I RTFM but still have a simple ?, David Woodhouse, 2004/04/25
- Re: I RTFM but still have a simple ?, wayne, 2004/04/25
- Re: I RTFM but still have a simple ?, Daniel Taylor, 2004/04/26
- Re: I RTFM but still have a simple ?, Alain Knaff, 2004/04/26
- Re: I RTFM but still have a simple ?, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/04/26
- greeting cards websites, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/04/26
- RE: greeting cards websites, Seth Goodman, 2004/04/26
- Re: I RTFM but still have a simple ?, Daniel Taylor, 2004/04/26
- Re: I RTFM but still have a simple ?, wayne, 2004/04/26
- Re: I RTFM but still have a simple ?, Daniel Taylor, 2004/04/26
- Re: I RTFM but still have a simple ?, Nico Kadel-Garcia, 2004/04/26
- Re: I RTFM but still have a simple ?, Graham Murray, 2004/04/25
- SV: I RTFM but still have a simple ?, Lars Dybdahl, 2004/04/25
Whitelists instead of SRS,
Mark Shewmaker,
2004/04/21
- Re: Whitelists instead of SRS, Theo Schlossnagle, 2004/04/21
- Re: Whitelists instead of SRS, Mark Shewmaker, 2004/04/22
- Re: Whitelists instead of SRS, Theo Schlossnagle, 2004/04/22
- Re: Whitelists instead of SRS, Tony Finch, 2004/04/22
- Re: Whitelists instead of SRS, Daniel Taylor, 2004/04/22
- Re: Whitelists instead of SRS, Tony Finch, 2004/04/22
- Re: Whitelists instead of SRS, Daniel Taylor, 2004/04/22
- Re: Whitelists instead of SRS, Tony Finch, 2004/04/22
- Re: Whitelists instead of SRS, Alain Knaff, 2004/04/22
- Re: Whitelists instead of SRS, Mark Shewmaker, 2004/04/22
- SV: Whitelists instead of SRS, Lars Dybdahl, 2004/04/22
- SV: Whitelists instead of SRS, Lars Dybdahl, 2004/04/22
- SV: Whitelists instead of SRS, Lars Dybdahl, 2004/04/22
Sender forwarding,
Stuart D. Gathman,
2004/04/21
- Re: Sender forwarding, Alan Hodgson, 2004/04/21
- RE: Sender forwarding, Seth Goodman, 2004/04/21
- Re: Sender forwarding, spf, 2004/04/22
- RE: Sender forwarding, Seth Goodman, 2004/04/22
- Re: Sender forwarding, spf, 2004/04/22
- RE: Sender forwarding, Seth Goodman, 2004/04/22
- RE: Sender forwarding, Seth Goodman, 2004/04/22
- RE: Sender forwarding, Dustin D. Trammell, 2004/04/24
- Re: Sender forwarding, David Woodhouse, 2004/04/21
- Re: Sender forwarding, marc, 2004/04/21
- RE: Sender forwarding, SPF_0x1b, 2004/04/22
'explain' etiquette, or is this a security concern?,
John A. Martin,
2004/04/20
- Re: 'explain' etiquette, or is this a security concern?, wayne, 2004/04/20
- Re: 'explain' etiquette, or is this a security concern?, John A. Martin, 2004/04/20
- Re: Re: 'explain' etiquette, or is this a security concern?, wayne, 2004/04/20
- Re: 'explain' etiquette, or is this a security concern?, John A. Martin, 2004/04/20
- Re: Re: 'explain' etiquette, or is this a security concern?, wayne, 2004/04/20
- Re: 'explain' etiquette, or is this a security concern?, John A. Martin, 2004/04/20
- Re: Re: 'explain' etiquette, or is this a security concern?, spf, 2004/04/21
- SV: 'explain' etiquette, or is this a security concern?, Lars Dybdahl, 2004/04/20
Draft - DNS Naming Convention for Outbound Internet Email Servers,
Spf Pobox,
2004/04/20
- Re: Draft - DNS Naming Convention for Outbound Internet Email Servers, Paul Howarth, 2004/04/20
- related to "mxout": a 3-step antispam rule that stops zombie spam, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/04/20
- RE: related to "mxout": a 3-step antispam rule that stops zombie spam, Seth Goodman, 2004/04/20
- Re: related to "mxout": a 3-step antispam rule that stops zombie spam, Theo Schlossnagle, 2004/04/21
- Re: related to "mxout": a 3-step antispam rule that stops zombie spam, Mark, 2004/04/21
- Re: related to "mxout": a 3-step antispam rule that stops zombie spam, Theo Van Dinter, 2004/04/21
- Re: related to "mxout": a 3-step antispam rule that stops zombie spam, Lloyd Zusman, 2004/04/21
- Re: Re: related to "mxout": a 3-step antispam rule that stops zombiespam, Mark, 2004/04/21
- Re: related to "mxout": a 3-step antispam rule that stops zombiespam, Lloyd Zusman, 2004/04/22
- Re: Re: related to "mxout": a 3-step antispam rule that stops zombiespam, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/04/22
- SV: Draft - DNS Naming Convention for Outbound Internet Email Servers, Lars Dybdahl, 2004/04/20
- Re: Draft - DNS Naming Convention for Outbound Internet Email Servers, Spf Pobox, 2004/04/20
SV: Security Paper on forgery bounce DDoS,
Lars Dybdahl,
2004/04/19
- Re: SV: Security Paper on forgery bounce DDoS, Tony Finch, 2004/04/19
- RE: Security Paper on forgery bounce DDoS, Seth Goodman, 2004/04/19
- SV: SV: Security Paper on forgery bounce DDoS, Lars Dybdahl, 2004/04/19
- SV: Security Paper on forgery bounce DDoS, Lars Dybdahl, 2004/04/20
- SV: Security Paper on forgery bounce DDoS, Lars Dybdahl, 2004/04/20
Publishing of SPF Records,
Stefan Engelbert,
2004/04/15
- Re: Publishing of SPF Records, wayne, 2004/04/15
- RE: Publishing of SPF Records, VoidLogic, 2004/04/15
- Re: Publishing of SPF Records, James Couzens, 2004/04/16
- SV: Publishing of SPF Records, Lars Dybdahl, 2004/04/15
- SV: Publishing of SPF Records, Lars Dybdahl, 2004/04/15
- RE: Publishing of SPF Records, Stefan Engelbert, 2004/04/15
- RE: Publishing of SPF Records, Stefan Engelbert, 2004/04/15
- SV: Publishing of SPF Records, Lars Dybdahl, 2004/04/15
- RE: Publishing of SPF Records, Stefan Engelbert, 2004/04/15
- SV: Publishing of SPF Records, Lars Dybdahl, 2004/04/15
- RE: Publishing of SPF Records, Stefan Engelbert, 2004/04/15
- RE: Publishing of SPF Records, Stefan Engelbert, 2004/04/15
- RE: Publishing of SPF Records, Stefan Engelbert, 2004/04/15
- RE: Publishing of SPF Records, Stefan Engelbert, 2004/04/15
- RE: Publishing of SPF Records, Stefan Engelbert, 2004/04/15
- RE: Publishing of SPF Records, Stefan Engelbert, 2004/04/15
- Re: Publishing of SPF Records, Fridrik Skulason, 2004/04/15
- Re: Publishing of SPF Records, wayne, 2004/04/15
- Re: Publishing of SPF Records, Daniel Taylor, 2004/04/15
- Counter proposal [Re: Publishing of SPF Records], Daniel Taylor, 2004/04/15
- Re: Publishing of SPF Records, Lars Dybdahl, 2004/04/15
Blacklists,
Lars Dybdahl,
2004/04/14
- Re: Blacklists, Paul Howarth, 2004/04/14
- Re: Blacklists, Bill Landry, 2004/04/14
- Re: Blacklists, Greg Hewgill, 2004/04/15
- SV: Blacklists, Lars Dybdahl, 2004/04/14
- Re: SV: Blacklists, David Woodhouse, 2004/04/15
- Re: SV: Blacklists, Dustin D. Trammell, 2004/04/15
- list of who's checking SPF, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/04/16
- Re: list of who's checking SPF, John A. Martin, 2004/04/16
- Re: Re: list of who's checking SPF, Kelson Vibber, 2004/04/16
- Re: list of who's checking SPF, David Woodhouse, 2004/04/16
- Re: list of who's checking SPF, Dustin D. Trammell, 2004/04/16
- Re: list of who's checking SPF, Wechsler, 2004/04/16
- Re: list of who's checking SPF, Dustin D. Trammell, 2004/04/16
- Re: list of who's checking SPF, wayne, 2004/04/16
- Re: list of who's checking SPF, Dustin D. Trammell, 2004/04/16
- Re: list of who's checking SPF, wayne, 2004/04/16
- Re: list of who's checking SPF, Dustin D. Trammell, 2004/04/16
- RE: Blacklists, Lyndon Eaton, 2004/04/15
- RE: Blacklists, Lyndon Eaton, 2004/04/15
- RE: Blacklists, Lyndon Eaton, 2004/04/15
testing spf setup,
Ben Greear,
2004/04/14
- Re: testing spf setup, wayne, 2004/04/14
- Re: testing spf setup, Ben Greear, 2004/04/14
- Re: testing spf setup, wayne, 2004/04/14
- Re: testing spf setup, Ben Greear, 2004/04/14
- Re: testing spf setup, Paul Howarth, 2004/04/14
- Re: testing spf setup, Nico Kadel-Garcia, 2004/04/14
- Re: testing spf setup, Paul Howarth, 2004/04/14
- Re: testing spf setup, Nico Kadel-Garcia, 2004/04/15
some statistics,
Roger Moser,
2004/04/14
- Re: some statistics, Theo Schlossnagle, 2004/04/14
- Re: some statistics, Nico Kadel-Garcia, 2004/04/14
- Re: some statistics, Nigel Metheringham, 2004/04/14
- Re: some statistics, Nico Kadel-Garcia, 2004/04/14
- Re: some statistics, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/04/14
- Re: some statistics, Nico Kadel-Garcia, 2004/04/15
- Re: some statistics, wayne, 2004/04/14
- Re: some statistics, Alan Hodgson, 2004/04/14
SRS concern,
Shaun T. Erickson,
2004/04/13
- Re: SRS concern, David Woodhouse, 2004/04/13
- Re: SRS concern, Shaun T. Erickson, 2004/04/13
- Re: SRS concern, spf, 2004/04/13
- Re: SRS concern, Shaun T. Erickson, 2004/04/13
- Re: SRS concern, spf, 2004/04/13
- Re: SRS concern, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/04/13
- Re: SRS concern, K.F.J. Martens, 2004/04/13
- Re: SRS concern, wayne, 2004/04/14
- Re: SRS concern, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/04/15
- RE: SRS concern, Eric Girard, 2004/04/13
- Re: SRS concern, Joe Rhett, 2004/04/13
- Re: SRS concern, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/04/13
- Re: [srs-discuss] Re: SRS concern, Shevek, 2004/04/16
- Re: [srs-discuss] Re: SRS concern, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/04/16
- Re: SRS concern, Neil Brown, 2004/04/13
- Re: SRS concern, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/04/13
- Re: SRS concern, John A. Martin, 2004/04/13
- Re: SRS concern, wayne, 2004/04/14
- Re: SRS concern, John Capo, 2004/04/13
- Re: SRS concern, Shaun T. Erickson, 2004/04/14
- Re: SRS concern, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/04/14
- Re: SRS concern, Shaun T. Erickson, 2004/04/14
- Re: SRS concern, Joe Rhett, 2004/04/14
- Re: SRS concern, K.F.J. Martens, 2004/04/14
- Re: SRS concern, Ben Greear, 2004/04/14
- Security Paper on forgery bounce DDoS, Dustin D. Trammell, 2004/04/16
- Re: Security Paper on forgery bounce DDoS, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/04/16
- RE: Security Paper on forgery bounce DDoS, Seth Goodman, 2004/04/17
- Re: Security Paper on forgery bounce DDoS, wayne, 2004/04/17
- RE: Security Paper on forgery bounce DDoS, Seth Goodman, 2004/04/17
- RE: Security Paper on forgery bounce DDoS, George Mitchell, 2004/04/17
- RE: Security Paper on forgery bounce DDoS, Seth Goodman, 2004/04/18
- Re: Security Paper on forgery bounce DDoS, wayne, 2004/04/18
- RE: Security Paper on forgery bounce DDoS, Seth Goodman, 2004/04/18
- Re: Security Paper on forgery bounce DDoS, wayne, 2004/04/18
- RE: Security Paper on forgery bounce DDoS, Seth Goodman, 2004/04/18
- Re: Security Paper on forgery bounce DDoS, Lars B. Dybdahl, 2004/04/18
- Re: SES vs. SPF, was Re: Security Paper on forgery bounce DDoS, Tony Finch, 2004/04/19
- Re: Security Paper on forgery bounce DDoS, wayne, 2004/04/17
- Re: Security Paper on forgery bounce DDoS, Hector Santos, 2004/04/18
- Re: Security Paper on forgery bounce DDoS, Ask Bjørn Hansen, 2004/04/18
- Re: Security Paper on forgery bounce DDoS, Theo Schlossnagle, 2004/04/18
- Re: Security Paper on forgery bounce DDoS, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/04/18
- Re: Security Paper on forgery bounce DDoS, Theo Schlossnagle, 2004/04/18
- Re: Security Paper on forgery bounce DDoS, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/04/19
- Re: Security Paper on forgery bounce DDoS, Greg Connor, 2004/04/18
- RE: Security Paper on forgery bounce DDoS, Seth Goodman, 2004/04/19
- RE: Security Paper on forgery bounce DDoS, Seth Goodman, 2004/04/18
- Re: Security Paper on forgery bounce DDoS, K.F.J. Martens, 2004/04/18
- Re: Security Paper on forgery bounce DDoS, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/04/18
- Re: Security Paper on forgery bounce DDoS, Hector Santos, 2004/04/18
- RE: Security Paper on forgery bounce DDoS, Tony Finch, 2004/04/19
- RE: Security Paper on forgery bounce DDoS, Seth Goodman, 2004/04/19
- Re: Security Paper on forgery bounce DDoS, wayne, 2004/04/17
- SV: SRS concern, Lars Dybdahl, 2004/04/14
first spf-enabled spam,
David,
2004/04/11
- Re: first spf-enabled spam, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/04/11
- Re: first spf-enabled spam, Nick Phillips, 2004/04/11
- Re: first spf-enabled spam, David, 2004/04/11
- Re: first spf-enabled spam, Lars B. Dybdahl, 2004/04/12
- Re: first spf-enabled spam, Nico Kadel-Garcia, 2004/04/12
- Re: first spf-enabled spam, David, 2004/04/12
- Re: first spf-enabled spam, Greg Wooledge, 2004/04/12
- Re: first spf-enabled spam, wayne, 2004/04/12
- Re: first spf-enabled spam, David, 2004/04/13
- Re: first spf-enabled spam, Daniel Taylor, 2004/04/13
- Re: first spf-enabled spam, Joe Rhett, 2004/04/13
- Re: first spf-enabled spam, David, 2004/04/13
- Re: first spf-enabled spam, Joe Rhett, 2004/04/13
- Re: first spf-enabled spam, Joe Rhett, 2004/04/13
- Re: first spf-enabled spam, David, 2004/04/13
- Re: first spf-enabled spam, David Brodbeck, 2004/04/19
- RE: first spf-enabled spam, Seth Goodman, 2004/04/19
- RE: first spf-enabled spam, Stuart D. Gathman, 2004/04/19
- RE: first spf-enabled spam, David Brodbeck, 2004/04/19
- Re: first spf-enabled spam, Nico Kadel-Garcia, 2004/04/19
- Re: first spf-enabled spam, Cary Fitch, 2004/04/19
- Re: first spf-enabled spam, wayne, 2004/04/19
- Re: first spf-enabled spam, Roy Badami, 2004/04/12
- Re: first spf-enabled spam, David, 2004/04/12
- Re: first spf-enabled spam, Jim Ramsay, 2004/04/12
- Re: Re: first spf-enabled spam, David, 2004/04/12
- Re: first spf-enabled spam, David Woodhouse, 2004/04/12
- Re: first spf-enabled spam, Dustin D. Trammell, 2004/04/12
- Re: first spf-enabled spam, David, 2004/04/12
- Re: first spf-enabled spam, Dustin D. Trammell, 2004/04/12
- Re: first spf-enabled spam, David, 2004/04/13
- Re: first spf-enabled spam, wayne, 2004/04/13
- Re: first spf-enabled spam, Ernesto Baschny, 2004/04/13
- Re: first spf-enabled spam, wayne, 2004/04/13
- Re: first spf-enabled spam, Tim Meadowcroft, 2004/04/13
- Re: first spf-enabled spam, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/04/13
- Re: first spf-enabled spam, David, 2004/04/13
- Re: first spf-enabled spam, Lars B. Dybdahl, 2004/04/12
- Re: first spf-enabled spam, David, 2004/04/13
- Re: first spf-enabled spam, Dustin D. Trammell, 2004/04/13
- Re: first spf-enabled spam, David, 2004/04/13
- Re: first spf-enabled spam, David Woodhouse, 2004/04/13
- Re: first spf-enabled spam, Daniel Taylor, 2004/04/13
- Re: first spf-enabled spam, Alan Hodgson, 2004/04/13
- Re: first spf-enabled spam, David, 2004/04/13
- RE: first spf-enabled spam, Vivien M., 2004/04/13
- Re: first spf-enabled spam, David, 2004/04/13
- RE: first spf-enabled spam, Vivien M., 2004/04/13
- Re: first spf-enabled spam, David, 2004/04/13
- Re: first spf-enabled spam, Aredridel, 2004/04/14
- Re: first spf-enabled spam, Joe Rhett, 2004/04/14
- RE: first spf-enabled spam, Vivien M., 2004/04/14
- Re: first spf-enabled spam, Paul Howarth, 2004/04/14
- Re: first spf-enabled spam, David, 2004/04/14
- Re: first spf-enabled spam, Paul Howarth, 2004/04/14
How to built an SPF record that is split in substrings?,
Roger Moser,
2004/04/06
- Re: How to built an SPF record that is split in substrings?, wayne, 2004/04/06
- Re: How to built an SPF record that is split in substrings?, Theo Schlossnagle, 2004/04/06
- Re: How to built an SPF record that is split in substrings?, wayne, 2004/04/06
- Re: How to built an SPF record that is split in substrings?, Dan Boresjo, 2004/04/06
- Re: How to built an SPF record that is split in substrings?, wayne, 2004/04/06
- Re: How to built an SPF record that is split in substrings?, Greg Connor, 2004/04/08
- Re: How to built an SPF record that is split in substrings?, wayne, 2004/04/08
- Re: How to built an SPF record that is split in substrings?, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/04/08
- Re: How to built an SPF record that is split in substrings?, Roy Badami, 2004/04/12
- Re: How to built an SPF record that is split in substrings?, Dustin D. Trammell, 2004/04/12
- Re: How to built an SPF record that is split in substrings?, Roy Badami, 2004/04/12
- Re: How to built an SPF record that is split in substrings?, Dustin D. Trammell, 2004/04/12
- Re: How to built an SPF record that is split in substrings?, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/04/12
- Re: How to built an SPF record that is split in substrings?, Roy Badami, 2004/04/12
- Re: How to built an SPF record that is split in substrings?, Greg Connor, 2004/04/12
- Re: How to built an SPF record that is split in substrings?, Greg Connor, 2004/04/08
- Re: How to built an SPF record that is split in substrings?, marc, 2004/04/06
getting 2822 protection as well as 2821 protection,
Meng Weng Wong,
2004/04/05
- Re: first class, second class, third class mail, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/04/05
- Re: first class, second class, third class mail, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/04/05
- Re: first class, second class, third class mail, Aredridel, 2004/04/06
- RE: first class, second class, third class mail, Seth Goodman, 2004/04/07
- RE: getting 2822 protection as well as 2821 protection, Seth Goodman, 2004/04/06
- Re: getting 2822 protection as well as 2821 protection, Aredridel, 2004/04/06
- Re: getting 2822 protection as well as 2821 protection, Jim Ramsay, 2004/04/07
10,000 Registrations,
marc,
2004/04/02
- Re: 10,000 Registrations, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/04/02
- Re: 10,000 Registrations, Mark Jeftovic, 2004/04/02
- Re: 10,000 Registrations, wayne, 2004/04/02
- SV: 10,000 Registrations, Lars Dybdahl, 2004/04/02
- SV: 10,000 Registrations, spf-team, 2004/04/03
- SV: SV: 10,000 Registrations, spf-team, 2004/04/03
- RE: SV: 10,000 Registrations, Lyndon Eaton, 2004/04/05
question regarding large international organisations adoption of SPF,
Gabriel Granger,
2004/04/02
- Re: question regarding large international organisations adoption of SPF, Paul Howarth, 2004/04/02
- Re: question regarding large international organisations adoption of SPF, csm, 2004/04/02
- use SMTP AUTH!, Meng Weng Wong, 2004/04/02
- Re: use SMTP AUTH!, Dave Crocker, 2004/04/02
- Re: use SMTP AUTH!, wayne, 2004/04/02
- Re: use SMTP AUTH!, Kelson Vibber, 2004/04/02
- Re: use SMTP AUTH!, Greg Connor, 2004/04/03
- Message not available
- Re: use SMTP AUTH!, Dave Crocker, 2004/04/04
Re: Just how many of the boxen really *need* to be in the spf rr,
Nico Kadel-Garcia,
2004/04/01
- Re: Just how many of the boxen really *need* to be in the spf rr, Ernesto Baschny, 2004/04/01
- Re: Just how many of the boxen really *need* to be in the spf rr, Greg Hewgill, 2004/04/01
- Re: Just how many of the boxen really *need* to be in the spf rr, hamish, 2004/04/01
- Re: Just how many of the boxen really *need* to be in the spf rr, Hector Santos, 2004/04/01
- Re: Just how many of the boxen really *need* to be in the spf rr, David Woodhouse, 2004/04/01
- Re: Just how many of the boxen really *need* to be in the spf rr, Aredridel, 2004/04/03
- Re: Just how many of the boxen really *need* to be in the spf rr, Nico Kadel-Garcia, 2004/04/04
- Re: Just how many of the boxen really *need* to be in the spf rr, Greg Connor, 2004/04/04
- Re: Just how many of the boxen really *need* to be in the spf rr, Nico Kadel-Garcia, 2004/04/04
- Re: Just how many of the boxen really *need* to be in the spf rr, Greg Connor, 2004/04/04
- Re: Just how many of the boxen really *need* to be in the spf rr, Kelson Vibber, 2004/04/05
- Re: Just how many of the boxen really *need* to be in the spf rr, Kelson Vibber, 2004/04/01