-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
I got a few comments on various e-mails.
Mandag den 12. april 2004 21:28 skrev Dustin D. Trammell:
Absolutely. I report every spam I receive that comes through as an
SPF pass.
Very good idea - when someone publishes SPF records, it indicates that
they care. Maybe the SPF documentation should include something about
who to contact if something is wrong? Normally it would be something
like postmaster(_at_)domainname or abuse(_at_)domainname, but a reference to
this might be useful, maybe even the possibility to specify it in the
SPF record?
Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
This is a *BIG* issue among my "Internet libertarian" friends. They
absolutely do not want their ISP's interfering in any way with their
home connectivity, and deeply resent any attempts to filter popular
virus ports, force the use of the ISP's SMTP servers for outgoing
email, etc.
In Denmark, the absolutely biggest internet provider (named "TDC")
has:
- - Disabled outgoing port 25 on all consumer ADSL connections except to
their own smtp servers.
- - Made no restrictions on business ADSL connections.
The price difference between those two types of connections is small,
but the difference is big. For instance, consumer ADSL connections
are better protected against incoming attacks. This means that the
average consumer is better protected and the advanced user can do
whatever he/she wants. You have a choice.
Lars.
- --
Mobil: 20331241
Evt.: 70201241
Fax.: 70201242
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFAevQD54sHDEeNGSIRArPzAKCgiNH9V7zYmVqQcfb9UFVj5MW5CQCdF1yO
u3++XS7gEg3QlqAd3jHJigk=
=3rB4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----