On Fri, 2004-10-22 at 05:56, Meng Weng Wong wrote:
On Fri, Oct 22, 2004 at 09:58:05AM +0100, Richard Bang wrote:
|
| Looking through the archives I see a lot of references to using spf to stop
| phishing, and this seems to be one of the major stumbling blocks of
| progress.
|
| I would propose that rather than trying to fly to the moon on our first RFC,
| it becomes a two stage process.
I tried to convince MS of this in March.
http://spf.pobox.com/slides/crossingbeams/0230.html
Actually I'd like to see it be a 3 stage process.
1) What to put into DNS (policy records), and ideally one DNS record to
handle everything.
2) 2821
3) 2822
For #1, the single record can point to other records if needed. But for
the small time operator he should be able to use a single record and
still fit in the UDP limit.
--
Jeff Macdonald <jmacdonald(_at_)e-dialog(_dot_)com>
E-Dialog