Moved to SPF-DEVEL re: djbdns is not free

On Sat, 2004-12-04 at 00:20 +0300, Bashar AlAbdulhadi wrote:
> I would agree on some what have been said by driving the topic little far
> than it was originally discussed, BUT
> What we need to know is DJBDNS free or not?
> Does it fall under GPL or not?
> Would SPF work just fine with it as Bind or not?
> People who write HOW-Tos should/shouldn't make 2 version of their howtos one
> for bind and one for djbdns?
I've moved this thread over to SPF-DEVEL for further discussion.  If you
aren't signed up Bashar, please do so via the links at
http://spf.pobox.com 

Cheers,

James


-- 
James Couzens,
Programmer
                        ^                            ( ( (      
      ((__))         __\|/__        __|+|__        '. ___ .'    
       (00)           (o o)          (0~0)        '  (> <) '    
---nn-(o__o)-nn---ooO--(_)--Ooo--ooO--(_)--Ooo---ooO--(_)--Ooo---
http://libspf.org -- ANSI C Sender Policy Framework library
http://libsrs.org -- ANSI C Sender Rewriting Scheme library
-----------------------------------------------------------------
PGP: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x7A7C7DCF

-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Read the whitepaper!  http://spf.pobox.com/whitepaper.pdf
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your 
subscription, 
please go to 
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part