spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Re: Agenda item: SenderID Position Statement

2004-12-09 06:22:13
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com
[mailto:owner-spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com]On Behalf Of Frank 
Ellermann
Sent: Thursday, December 09, 2004 2:46 AM
To: spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com
Subject: [spf-discuss] Re: Agenda item: SenderID Position Statement


Scott Kitterman wrote:

I'm going to get myself in trouble by using an analogy...

True.

At this point, PRA is like the weather.

NAK.  Intentional abuse for a profit is criminal behaviour,
it has nothing to do with weather conditions.  Bye, Frank

What I meant was that we can complain about it all we want.  We aren't going
to change it.  Also, I'd agree with unethical, but I doubt any actual laws
are broken.

Scott Kitterman