Thanks Andy, Alex and Frank for the replies. I'll make some changes
tomorrow and circulate it around again.
gregc
--Andy Bakun <spf(_at_)leave-it-to-grace(_dot_)com> wrote:
On Thu, 2004-12-09 at 16:42, Greg Connor wrote:
Team-
Since "reuse of v=spf1 records" seems to be the most pressing issue, I
have written a "position statement" that addresses inappropriate reuse
and doesn't address other issues (PRA license or technical problems).
...
Link:
http://nekodojo.org/~gconnor/spf-context-usage.txt
Thanks Greg. I don't like how it specifically mentions Microsoft and
PRA by name (unlike my original short paragraph, but I was going for
something to be included in a standards document, rather than something
that is more along the lines of a position statement), but overall, this
accurate reflects *my* SPF context usage position.
Andy.
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Read the whitepaper! http://spf.pobox.com/whitepaper.pdf
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription, please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com
--
Greg Connor <gconnor(_at_)nekodojo(_dot_)org>