-----Original Message-----
From: owner-spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com
[mailto:owner-spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com]On Behalf Of Lou Katz
Sent: Friday, December 10, 2004 12:04 PM
To: spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com
Subject: Re: [spf-discuss] Agenda item: SenderID Position Statement
Minor English syntactical quibble:
On Fri, Dec 10, 2004 at 08:03:31AM -0800, william(at)elan.net wrote:
On Fri, 10 Dec 2004, Scott Kitterman wrote:
snip ...
- Users should not buy or use software that configured to use "v=spf1"
-----------------------------------------------^^^ (insert 'is' or
'can be'? or whatever)
records in an inappropriate context.
Ok.
I meant is.
Can be would be nice, but that's pretty unlikely. My thought is to tell
people that if they end up with a software tool that uses v=spf1 records
inappropriately, we think they should turn it off.
Scott Kitterman