spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Agenda item: SenderID Position Statement

2004-12-09 17:01:56
On Thu, Dec 09, 2004 at 02:42:51PM -0800, Greg Connor wrote:

Please browse the statement and see if it is compatible with your own vision 
of SPF :)  Suggestions for changes are appreciated.

Maybe the example (Microsoft's PRA) should be written as a separate
paragraph, not scattered inbetween the statement.  In other words,
move them below the recommendations in a section of known-bads or so.
This will (IMHO) make it more clear that it is just an example (albeit
the only one) and that the statement is not against Microsoft but against
abuse of spf v1.

 - Users should not buy or use software that uses "v=spf1" records in an 
inappropriate
     context.

Great :) Can't wait for Exchange 200x.  Seriously, I think this needs
some rewriting.

" - Users should avoid using "v=spf1" records in an inappropriate context,
    either by not buying the product in the first place or by disabling
    the feature
"

(possibly  s/feature/malfunctioning feature/)


cheers,
Alex