Re: Agenda item: SenderID Position Statement

In <NGBBLEIJOEEEBMEIAPBKEEPDHDAA(_dot_)scott(_at_)kitterman(_dot_)com> Scott 
Kitterman <spf2(_at_)kitterman(_dot_)com> writes:

I'm with Andy on this one.  Submitted for your consideration:


I also like this draft much better.

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: Agenda item: SenderID Position Statement, (continued) Re: Agenda item: SenderID Position Statement, Frank Ellermann Re: Re: Agenda item: SenderID Position Statement, David Woodhouse RE: Agenda item: SenderID Position Statement, Andy Bakun RE: Agenda item: SenderID Position Statement, Scott Kitterman RE: Agenda item: SenderID Position Statement, Andy Bakun RE: Agenda item: SenderID Position Statement, Greg Connor RE: Agenda item: SenderID Position Statement, Andy Bakun RE: Agenda item: SenderID Position Statement, Greg Connor RE: Agenda item: SenderID Position Statement, Scott Kitterman RE: Agenda item: SenderID Position Statement, terry Re: Agenda item: SenderID Position Statement, wayne <= RE: Agenda item: SenderID Position Statement, william(at)elan.net Re: Agenda item: SenderID Position Statement, Lou Katz RE: Agenda item: SenderID Position Statement, Scott Kitterman RE: Agenda item: SenderID Position Statement, Greg Connor RE: Agenda item: SenderID Position Statement, Scott Kitterman RE: Agenda item: SenderID Position Statement, william(at)elan.net Re: Agenda item: SenderID Position Statement, Alex van den Bogaerdt Re: Agenda item: SenderID Position Statement, Frank Ellermann Re: Agenda item: SenderID Position Statement, wayne RE: Agenda item: SenderID Position Statement, william(at)elan.net