Sorry, Frank, have to disagree with you on this one . . .
If the contract between you and your client clearly states, as does ours,
that e-mail, web hosting services and inter-agency connectivity is NOT
GAURANTEED, then you have no liability.
No one can be responsible for the internet.
It is not regulated.
It is not licensed.
The internet, and the services provided over the internet's connectivity,
cannot be held to a guaranteed delivery standard in a court of law within
the United States.
ANYONE who makes a PROMISE of delivering either a website or e-mail is
making a SERIOUS mistake.
Bruce Barnes
ChicagoNetTech Inc
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com
[mailto:owner-spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com]On Behalf Of Frank
Ellermann
Sent: Thursday, December 09, 2004 09:22
To: spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com
Subject: [spf-discuss] Re: Agenda item: SenderID Position Statement
Scott Kitterman wrote:
We aren't going to change it.
I do, I just say NO, I say NO here. I say NO in ASRG. I say
NO in MARID. I say NO in dan-am. I say NO in spamcop. I say
NO in gmane.discuss. I'd say NO to anybody using it on v=spf1.
Just say NO, it works. Not always, but sometimes, and if you
don't try it they could get away with whatever they want... :-(
I doubt any actual laws are broken.
If your mail provider uses it to filter your inbound, and this
results in lost mails, then he has a very serious legal problem
if you would sue him. This is not only unethical ignorance, it
could be culpable negligence. As soon as we have our "official
standard" - that's always the alpha and omega of anything here.
Bye, Frank
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Read the whitepaper! http://spf.pobox.com/whitepaper.pdf
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com