spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: spf-statement-on-SenderID

2004-12-12 10:03:03
from [John A. Martin] [Permanent Link] 
"william" == william elan net
"Re: Re: spf-statement-on-SenderID"
 Sun, 12 Dec 2004 02:46:52 -0800 (PST)


    william> Over 20% of Internet email volume can be usefully tested
    william> with SPF Classic.

This has appeared in several drafts.  Perhaps I am dense, but I have
no clue what it means.  Could someone please explain?  Where is the
data supporting this statement?

Also, perhaps the current drafts would all benefit from being prefaced
by introducing what the statement addresses and why.

        jam
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: spf-statement-on-SenderID, John A. Martin
Next by Date:  Re: Abusing SPF record for PRA testing, Nico Kadel-Garcia
Previous by Thread:  Re: Re: spf-statement-on-SenderID, jpinkerton
Next by Thread:  Re: Re: spf-statement-on-SenderID, Greg Connor
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]