-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Radu Hociung wrote:
| Chuck Mead wrote:
|
|> 4. A lot of people have ideas. This is a good thing but some of what I
|> hear bandied about involves Wiki's (more security issues than I even
|> want to think about) and some other people have suggested a custom
|> interface be built. Uhm... I only have one question about that... why
|> the hell is it that everytime a net based, geek driven project decides
|> to update their web site they start discussing development of new custom
|> interfaces? To what end... and more over... who gives a crap? I could
|> take Mambo and build us a perfectly comfortable site in a day. Others
|> here could take their favorite CMS and do the same.
|
|
| I believe the core issue to be resolved is maintainability. When you
| have one person in charge of the updates, you get what we have now.
|
| Wiki's can also be private, with a closed membership that is allowed to
| make changes. Perhaps this idea should not be hastily ignored.
That's fine... and I *DO* get what you are saying. But this is not the
only way to allow more than one person to work on the web site. A number
of CMS's allow this and present information in a more integrated way.
Perhaps Wiki could be used for pieces of the site... maybe the FAQ or
something perhaps...?
- --
Chuck Mead <csm(_at_)redhat(_dot_)com>
Instructor II (and resident Postfix bigot), GLS
Disclaimer: "It's Thursday and my name is Locutus of B0rk!"
Addendum: "Bwahahaha! Fire up the orbital mind-control lasers!"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFCIKX0Zfy0juH51WsRAryGAJ426iTd+dpdBL8j0YPgCkBBslkrpgCfZVYx
4yHgNHGoXZNFkq12V26QF3w=
=/oTD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----