spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

the state of the web site updates and some discussion

2005-02-26 08:56:54
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

I have several thoughts about this.

1. We do not have rights to make changes to the web site right now. At
least not that I am aware of and I think I would know it if we did.

2. I am also unhappy with the state of the web site.

3. I think SPF deserves its own domain name instead of riding as a
sub-domain of pobox.com.

4. A lot of people have ideas. This is a good thing but some of what I
hear bandied about involves Wiki's (more security issues than I even
want to think about) and some other people have suggested a custom
interface be built. Uhm... I only have one question about that... why
the hell is it that everytime a net based, geek driven project decides
to update their web site they start discussing development of new custom
interfaces? To what end... and more over... who gives a crap? I could
take Mambo and build us a perfectly comfortable site in a day. Others
here could take their favorite CMS and do the same.

So... what I propose we do is register a domain for spf and then get it
hosted somewhere on a CMS that several of our number are familiar with
and able to template and manage.

Thoughts?

Other suggestions?

- --
Chuck Mead <csm(_at_)redhat(_dot_)com>
Instructor II (and resident Postfix bigot), GLS
Disclaimer: "It's Thursday and my name is Locutus of B0rk!"
Addendum: "Bwahahaha! Fire up the orbital mind-control lasers!"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFCIJxGZfy0juH51WsRAktFAKCcw7pQr6hlnb7vdjwmSX4luzKIswCdGwM5
jRs4hktKUdQvhk2v0EcPVCc=
=jswP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----