-----Original Message-----
From: owner-spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com
[mailto:owner-spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com] On Behalf Of Chuck
Mead
Sent: zaterdag 26 februari 2005 16:29
To: spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com
Subject: Re: [spf-discuss] URGENT REQUEST: Change the webpage please
| SPF should immediately STOP referring to itself with SENDER
| ID in all ways and ignore Microsoft. All the cooperation with
| Microsoft is doing is slowing the entire process down and,
| potentially, relegating SPF to the bit bucket.
Which is exactly what the majority of the council thinks too, so you
are not alone. :-)
Although this should not be taken "ex cathedra" (as if spoken for the
entire council), as one of the people on the council, I currently operate
under the model of de facto having severed the SPF ties to Microsoft.
| "SMTP + SPF
| Sender Policy Framework
| an essential part of Sender ID"
SPF relates to SenderID in, say, the manner in which DNS relates to BIND:
the latter is ostentatiously dependent on the former, but the former in
ZERO ways dependent on the latter. And that really sums it up nicely.
And although I am not easily offended, lol, that text is certainly long
overdue for removal.
- Mark
System Administrator Asarian-host.org
---
"If you were supposed to understand it,
we wouldn't call it code." - FedEx