Yea - well - while you're all discussing the flavour of vanilla you'd like,
in the meantime take the spf.pobox.com website *down* to prevent spreading
*more* alarm and confusion....
Slainte,
JohnP.
johnp(_at_)idimo(_dot_)com
ICQ 313355492
YahooIM j_pinx
AIM johnpinx
Skype johnpinx
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chuck Mead" <csm(_at_)redhat(_dot_)com>
To: <spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com>
Sent: Saturday, February 26, 2005 5:38 PM
Subject: Re: [spf-discuss] the state of the web site updates and some
discussion
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Radu Hociung wrote:
| Chuck Mead wrote:
|
|> 4. A lot of people have ideas. This is a good thing but some of what I
|> hear bandied about involves Wiki's (more security issues than I even
|> want to think about) and some other people have suggested a custom
|> interface be built. Uhm... I only have one question about that... why
|> the hell is it that everytime a net based, geek driven project decides
|> to update their web site they start discussing development of new
custom
|> interfaces? To what end... and more over... who gives a crap? I could
|> take Mambo and build us a perfectly comfortable site in a day. Others
|> here could take their favorite CMS and do the same.
|
|
| I believe the core issue to be resolved is maintainability. When you
| have one person in charge of the updates, you get what we have now.
|
| Wiki's can also be private, with a closed membership that is allowed to
| make changes. Perhaps this idea should not be hastily ignored.
That's fine... and I *DO* get what you are saying. But this is not the
only way to allow more than one person to work on the web site. A number
of CMS's allow this and present information in a more integrated way.
Perhaps Wiki could be used for pieces of the site... maybe the FAQ or
something perhaps...?
- --
Chuck Mead <csm(_at_)redhat(_dot_)com>
Instructor II (and resident Postfix bigot), GLS
Disclaimer: "It's Thursday and my name is Locutus of B0rk!"
Addendum: "Bwahahaha! Fire up the orbital mind-control lasers!"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFCIKX0Zfy0juH51WsRAryGAJ426iTd+dpdBL8j0YPgCkBBslkrpgCfZVYx
4yHgNHGoXZNFkq12V26QF3w=
=/oTD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Read the whitepaper! http://spf.pobox.com/whitepaper.pdf
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com