----- Original Message -----
From: "Stuart D. Gathman" <stuart(_at_)bmsi(_dot_)com>
To: <spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com>
Sent: Saturday, February 26, 2005 6:10 PM
Subject: Re: [spf-discuss] forged email DSN
On Sat, 26 Feb 2005, jpinkerton wrote:
Just a few comments on the text of the auto-reply - inserted as
It's an auto-DSN (return path is <>) - so that senders with a clue
never see it due to DSN filtering, whether SES, SRS, or tracking outgoing
return paths. I *HATE* it when virus/spam filters send replies.
I suggest that you remove reference to http://spf.pobox.com in view of
it's
increasing inaccuracies / misleading information / confusion over
SID&SPF /
mixups over how to use that wizard / non-maintained status.
What should I put? I don't like spf.pobox.com anymore either, but
what information site should I reference? http://moongroup.com ?
ROFL - nice one. Sorry I couldn't come up with anything to replace it - but
I would seriously suggest that *nothing* is better than the pobox website.
I run the spfhelp.net site - if you want to look at that and think about it,
but I have had little time to edit it recently and it's falling out of date
too.....
Suggest:
.........lished a sender policy, there is no other way of bringing this
problem to your attention.
Changed. Will post revised message after incorporating all the
other great feedback.
Cool - good work..
Slainte,
JohnP.
johnp(_at_)idimo(_dot_)com
ICQ 313355492
YahooIM j_pinx
AIM johnpinx
Skype johnpinx