spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Re: DNS load research

2005-03-24 14:16:21


Stuart D. Gathman wrote:
On Thu, 24 Mar 2005, Radu Hociung wrote:


I propose that we add a mask modifier that looks like this:

-m=64/6 m=80.66/16 m=192/3


Cool idea, but why do we need any more syntax?  How is that different from:

-ip4:64/6 -ip4:80.66/16 -ip4:192/3

?

The SPF compiler would just put those shortcuts in the first record.


I think you misunderstood. The legit outgoing servers _are_ on those nets, so you don't want to fail them with -. An way to exclude IP ranges is needed.


Regards,
Radu


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>