spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Re: DNS load research

2005-03-25 11:44:00
Frank Ellermann wrote:
Andy Bakun wrote:
On Thu, 2005-03-24 at 14:51 -0500, Stuart D. Gathman wrote:


Cool idea, but why do we need any more syntax?  How is that
different from:
-ip4:64/6 -ip4:80.66/16 -ip4:192/3


Nevertheless, the original idea still stands.


AFAIK you can't skip the zeros in ip4.  So if what you have is
"very expensive 64/6, 80.66/16, and 192/3 stuff", and you want
a shortcut to exclude anything else at the begin, you could try

-ip4:0.0.0.0/2   from   0.0.0.0 up to  63.255.255.255
-ip4:68.0.0.0/6  from  68.0.0.0 up to  71.255.255.255
-ip4:72.0.0.0/5  from  72.0.0.0 up to  79.255.255.255
-ip4:80.0.0.0/4  from  80.0.0.0 up to  95.255.255.255
-ip4:96.0.0.0/3  from  96.0.0.0 up to 127.255.255.255
-ip4:128.0.0.0/1 from 128.0.0.0 up to 255.255.255.255

That's only for the 64/6 portion, I needed a quick script for
this "anticidr" task, and it doesn't handle more than one part.

So why not use m=65.0.0.0/6 ?

I can change my proposed syntax, and it would add at most 6bytes per mech (.0.0.0) to require fully-specified IP quads.

Radu.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>