On Thu, 2005-03-24 at 15:47, Andy Bakun wrote:
On Thu, 2005-03-24 at 14:51 -0500, Stuart D. Gathman wrote:
On Thu, 24 Mar 2005, Radu Hociung wrote:
I propose that we add a mask modifier that looks like this:
-m=64/6 m=80.66/16 m=192/3
Cool idea, but why do we need any more syntax? How is that different from:
-ip4:64/6 -ip4:80.66/16 -ip4:192/3
Well, damn, that's better than the lame exists:%{ir1} scheme I posted
about. I forgot about that.
Scratch that. As Radu pointed out to me in this thread, and I just
pointed out in another post, these are not equivalent. Nevertheless,
the original idea still stands.
--
Andy Bakun <spf(_at_)leave-it-to-grace(_dot_)com>