Re: Re: DNS load research2005-03-24 14:47:18On Thu, 2005-03-24 at 14:51 -0500, Stuart D. Gathman wrote: On Thu, 24 Mar 2005, Radu Hociung wrote:I propose that we add a mask modifier that looks like this: -m=64/6 m=80.66/16 m=192/3Cool idea, but why do we need any more syntax? How is that different from: -ip4:64/6 -ip4:80.66/16 -ip4:192/3 Well, damn, that's better than the lame exists:%{ir1} scheme I posted about. I forgot about that. -- Andy Bakun <spf(_at_)leave-it-to-grace(_dot_)com>
|
|