spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Re: DNS load research

2005-03-24 14:47:18
On Thu, 2005-03-24 at 14:51 -0500, Stuart D. Gathman wrote:
On Thu, 24 Mar 2005, Radu Hociung wrote:

I propose that we add a mask modifier that looks like this:

-m=64/6 m=80.66/16 m=192/3

Cool idea, but why do we need any more syntax?  How is that different from:

-ip4:64/6 -ip4:80.66/16 -ip4:192/3

Well, damn, that's better than the lame exists:%{ir1} scheme I posted
about.  I forgot about that.

-- 
Andy Bakun <spf(_at_)leave-it-to-grace(_dot_)com>


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>