wayne wrote:
I hope you didn't mind the 12hr wait too much.
I'd wait much much longer for something like this:
| I will then ask the IETF to advance this SPF
| specification as a Proposed Standard.
First nit, Scott Hollenbeck said that all new drafts
that somehow make it to the IESG _must_ use the new
RfC 2234bis instead of 2234 in their references.
Here's the bibxml link for 2234bis;
<http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/bibxml3/reference.I-D.crocker-abnf-rfc2234bis.xml>
Don't worry that it's ugly, RfC 2234bis will get a
number before SPF, and the RfC-editor is supposed to
fix it - I asked twice, it's really the way how he
wants it.
Second nit: The new magic formula is ipr="full3978"
instead of full3667. Don't laugh, they'll check this
soon, IIRC starting May 6.
Third nit: The "zone cut" is out, so you don't need
[RfC 2181] anymore in the references.
Thanks for the new draft, Frank