In <4270E967(_dot_)5F71(_at_)xyzzy(_dot_)claranet(_dot_)de> Frank Ellermann
<nobody(_at_)xyzzy(_dot_)claranet(_dot_)de> writes:
Julian Mehnle wrote:
I don't get where Frank is going here, either.
See 23:04 - 23:08 in your log, the "DNS load issue" was the
point of Radu's mask idea among others. SPF optimizer etc.
Maybe some or even most of these discussions led nowhere or
went in circles about include:not.me But it was also about
real issues like the wizard.
Yes, the DNS load issue has been rehashed many times. So have
forwarding problems, and whether SPF publishers should use -all.
The point of that discussion in the SPF-council meeting is that there
was something on the agenda that no one could remember *what* was
supposed to be decided. I, personally, think that SPF council
meetings are a very bad place to try and debate and decide issues. We
should use the time to make decisions.
[In another message]
I wonder from where you take the election period being 6
months. Seriously, I wonder.
One Council member apparently resigned without bothering to
tell anybody. Another announced six months.
Yes, I did say that I would resign after 6 months. I also said that I
would get the SPF-classic spec pushed through the IETF, which I
haven't done. Maybe I don't need to be on the council to do the SPF
stuff. Maybe breaking my word twice doesn't make things right, but I
think I'm going to try sticking around on the council for at least
another month in order to actually get the SPF spec through the IETF.
The remaining three members don't have a quorum.
I believe the discussion back when the vote was taken was that if a
council member needed to be replaced, we would go down the list of the
top vote getters.
-wayne