-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Frank Ellermann wrote:
Julian Mehnle wrote:
I'd say it is more like
http://look.mom.i.can.have.lots.of.sub.domains.org
http://does.not.exist.invalid would be shorter, and depending
on the clue of the Web spider / blind user / etc. an "invalid"
might be more user friendly.
You can assign an MX record to look.mom.i.can.have.lots.of.sub.domains.org,
which is what I implied. Then you can, for fun, use that über-long domain
in a vanity e-mail address. Now, the fact that such über-long domain
names aren't particularly useful doesn't make them illegit, does it?
MX->CNAME is about as illegit as "v=spf1 redirect=claranet.de".
I'm no expert in all details of the RFCI listing policy. When
I'm unhappy with what they do I discuss it on RFCI discuss or
with the admins (Derek or Ralf), and after all it's Derek's
server: his rules.
Of course, people may run whatever blacklists they want. Receivers just
shouldn't be using blacklists with stupid listing policies.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCoezZwL7PKlBZWjsRAoDZAKC4lVr+VG/W+bHyi46tAkbo+SaHWQCdGDfi
qOnOue+5DL7Q4Ar+gNMasXA=
=QLPG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----