Roger B.A. Klorese wrote:
Terry Fielder wrote:
But when MTA X gives the message to the target X intended Y, when Y
passes msg onto Z it really should be Y (not X) that is responsible
for the message getting to Z. Hence to me why it is re-injection
whether or not there is re-addressing.
Injection, shminjection.
If the message is MAIL FROM:<me(_at_)here(_dot_)com>, it does not become MAIL
FROM:<you(_at_)somewhere-else(_dot_)com> just because it gets passed along. It's
still mail from me(_at_)here(_dot_)com(_dot_) It's not MAIL
BEINGINJECTEDINANSMTPSESSIONBY:.
Same old arguments about what constitutes forgery. Everyone has an
opinion. No point in restating them here, its beaten to death.
But *I* don't want unauthorized MTA's to be able to send emails claiming
to from my domain (whether or not those emails are "just passing
through" a fordwarder/unauthorized relay/re-injector/whatever.)
Terry
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Read the whitepaper! http://spf.pobox.com/whitepaper.pdf
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription, please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com
--
Terry Fielder
terry(_at_)greatgulfhomes(_dot_)com
Associate Director Software Development and Deployment
Great Gulf Homes / Ashton Woods Homes
Fax: (416) 441-9085