At 02:00 AM 6/30/2005 +0200, Frank Ellermann wrote:
David MacQuigg wrote:
1st issue: please trim your posts,
Is this better? I prefer to have all relevant prior context quoted, but
then I find it easy to scroll past the quoted section. I find your posts
hard to follow, because I can't remember the prior context. I guess I'm
trying to do too many things at once.
> it seems like getting rid of fake bounces is only getting rid
> of a minor annoyance. They can be rejected by other means
> just as well.
I didn't mean to start a whole new tangent here, and I'm sorry if I
underestimated the importance of eliminating backscatter in the benefits of
SPF. To me the big benefit is still the possibility of eliminating
spam. If SPF is successful, I believe the rest of the pieces of a complete
solution to the spam problem will follow. That is the main reason for my
interest in SPF. I believe others on this list share my goals, but maybe I
have misunderstood.
--
Dave
************************************************************ *
* David MacQuigg, PhD email: david_macquigg at yahoo.com * *
* IC Design Engineer phone: USA 520-721-4583 * * *
* Analog Design Methodologies * * *
* 9320 East Mikelyn Lane * * *
* VRS Consulting, P.C. Tucson, Arizona 85710 *
************************************************************ *