-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Dick St.Peters wrote:
Do most people here consider them to be in conflict *if* the PRA use
of v=spf1 records is eliminated?
I cannot speak for "most people here", but I think, no, there would be
_no_ significant conflict between Sender ID and SPF if Sender ID inter-
preted "v=spf1" records the same as "spf2.0/mfrom".
I also think the PRA is mostly useless, but as you said this is
irrelevant. Let the market decide.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDGyU+wL7PKlBZWjsRAmJ5AJoDl2eR9j2ixzpfbFgiNT+0FlVx0wCgyQ2M
RLVRlAdAt0tR1r/yTUvmz2U=
=sz/4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com