In <002201c5b0c0$ab6b9110$6401a8c0(_at_)hdev1> "Hector Santos"
<spf-discuss(_at_)winserver(_dot_)com> writes:
And immediately the spf-bias WG chairs began to [...]
By "spf-bias", do you mean that the MARID WG chairs had a pro-SPF
bias, or an anti-SPF bias?
The rest of your post makes it sound like you think they had an
anti-SPF bias, but I actually think they were both pro-SPF and a
pro-PRA. (And they didn't find these two to be in deep conflict.)
-wayne
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com