On Wed, 21 Sep 2005, Dennis Willson wrote:
The only real SPF relevant issue I see here is:
I think there should be a way within the mail servers (like sendmail, etc...)
that allows the SPF status to be used as part of a decision of a later
process. There then needs to be a way to carry the SPF status with the email
(that a Spammer can't fake) so the later processes don't have to do the
entire SPF tests again. I don't really want to multiply the SPF lookups and
calculations multiple times for each email.
It's called 'Received-SPF'. The SPF relevant issue is education, as usual.
(Yes, SPF checkers should delete any prior Received-SPF header if they
don't add their own at the top.)
--
Stuart D. Gathman <stuart(_at_)bmsi(_dot_)com>
Business Management Systems Inc. Phone: 703 591-0911 Fax: 703 591-6154
"Confutatis maledictis, flamis acribus addictis" - background song for
a Microsoft sponsored "Where do you want to go from here?" commercial.
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com