Seems to have coincided with the letter sent for correcting the SenderID
specs.
Maybe there is some other information out there indicating that SPF is a
bad idea or people are waiting for some sort of resolution.
There has to be some growth, from the last 2 or three weeks, there have
been at least one probably two requests for setup help posted here.
And just who gave this Andy Newton a license to be grumpy? I want one.
-------------------------------------
Mike Kelly
Systems Tech
Broadview Software Inc.
416-778-0623 x239
mkelly(_at_)broadviewsoftware(_dot_)com
-----Original Message-----
From: wayne [mailto:wayne(_at_)schlitt(_dot_)net]
Sent: Wednesday, November 09, 2005 12:16
To: spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com
Subject: Re: [spf-discuss] News from the MAAWG/APWG conference
In <x4slu5bvwm(_dot_)fsf(_at_)footbone(_dot_)schlitt(_dot_)net> wayne
<wayne(_at_)schlitt(_dot_)net>
writes:
The Messaging Anti-Abuse Working Group (MAAWG)[1] and the
Anti-Phishing Working Group (APWG) are holding a conference this week.
According to the following story, MicroSoft announced a bunch of
results.
* 87% increase in the .com and .net domains since March
* 27% since the July email authentication summit
* 6% increase in all domains world wide since July
Hmmm...
In contrast, Andy Newton is saying that there has been ZERO SPF record
growth since June.
See:
http://hxr.us/blojsom/blog/grumpops/computers/anti-spam/
-wayne
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com