spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [spf-discuss] not sure how this is happening[Scanned]

2006-01-27 08:57:15
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Frank Ellermann wrote:
Arjen de Korte wrote:
Many SPF implementations will not check HELO if a non-empty MAIL FROM
is present (including Mail::SPF::Query). 

We have it as SHOULD for about a year now in the spec., and Julian
updated Mail::SPF::Query in the last weeks, does it really not check HELO
in its default configuration ?

What's a Mail::SPF::Query default configuration?

Seriously, M:S:Q does _not_ perform an independent HELO check -- it never 
did and never will.  I even documented this in 1.999 RC3.  M:S:Q only uses 
the HELO identity if MAIL FROM is empty.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFD2kKxwL7PKlBZWjsRAt8mAKDRmuN+Jtt2OBi8tNsJEYURwA9VcQCdEYE9
BxuBx4tSFbHU8Z7WKnW1cRs=
=c9zF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your 
subscription, 
please go to 
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com