"Dick St.Peters" <stpeters(_at_)NetHeaven(_dot_)com> writes:
When considering SPF+DKIM, I think the most important question to
answer first is "What does SPF bring to the table that DKIM does not?"
The most obvious answer is "Ability to reject messages without reading
them."
Anything else?
The ability to indicate that the site does not send mail. There has
been some discussion on the DKIM list about an SSP of never sends
mail, but SPF is more appropriate for this.
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com