spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Re: spam.co.nz (was: Which SPF implementation to choose?)

2006-08-29 08:37:31
On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 08:12:04AM -0700, Monte Hansen wrote:

v=spf1 a mx ptr include:activehost.com\000

I ignore trailing nulls. In Windows, everything above the Win32 API layer do 
this automatically. At the Win32 layer, it comes naturally to strip trailing 
nulls since strings are generally null terminated.

I don't think this is OK.  Isn't DNS binary transparent?

I don't really care what windows does; as far as I'm concerned I have
to look for the, nonexistent, toplevel domain "com\000".

Alex

-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your 
subscription, 
please go to 
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>