spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [spf-discuss] Re: spam.co.nz

2006-08-30 11:27:10
On Wed, 30 Aug 2006, Alex van den Bogaerdt wrote:

For SPF record testers, I think it is quite all right to flag a
record without "all" or "redirect" as being wrong.  People that
know the ins and outs may still choose to ignore the advice.

Yes, but that is different than a permerror.  You MUST not 
throw a permerror for missing all or redirect.  In pyspf, we
throw an AmbiguityWarning for such checks in "harsh" mode.  This has no
effect on strict SPF result, but will display in Scott's online record tester.

-- 
              Stuart D. Gathman <stuart(_at_)bmsi(_dot_)com>
    Business Management Systems Inc.  Phone: 703 591-0911 Fax: 703 591-6154
"Confutatis maledictis, flammis acribus addictis" - background song for
a Microsoft sponsored "Where do you want to go from here?" commercial.

-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your 
subscription, 
please go to 
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>