On Thursday 15 March 2007 13:58, Stuart D. Gathman wrote:
On Thu, 15 Mar 2007, Scott Kitterman wrote:
That is correct. This is not even a 'violation' of the RFC as RFC 4408
has explicit allowance for addition of unknown modifiers later.
However, modifiers aren't allowed to change the SPF result, which
'default=' does. I'll have to add a test:
testdefault.example.com: IN TXT "v=spf1 default=pass"
which had better result in neutral.
Good point.
Scott K
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?list_id=735