spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

[spf-discuss] Re: Softfail when spf-checking mails from this list, max_dns_mx=5

2007-03-15 09:20:49
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Thomas Jacob wrote:
BTW don't we want to read "comply" where "conform" is written in

        ... there are currently two library implementations that are
        known to _fully conform_ to the final SPFv1 specification (RFC
        4408)

I'm trying to understand the difference between "comply" and "fully
conform" in this context (my native language not being English), could
you please shed some light on that?

I don't think there is any.  What makes you think otherwise?

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFF+W3ewL7PKlBZWjsRAgovAJ0XquRtveU/UA8XXDWyeGcnd+iSsQCggGTA
AU9sk002zUknbk73oDdi4TI=
=unID
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your 
subscription, 
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?list_id=735

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>