SPF Discuss (date)
June 25, 2007
- Re: [spf-discuss] Fwd: Google oddity (was: SPF), Stuart D. Gathman, 15:14
- Re: [spf-discuss] Fwd: Google oddity (was: SPF), Thomas Jacob, 08:31
- Re: [spf-discuss] Fwd: Google oddity (was: SPF), Stuart D. Gathman, 08:14
- Re: [spf-discuss] Fwd: Google oddity (was: SPF), Stefan Görling, 07:45
- Re: [spf-discuss] Fwd: Google oddity (was: SPF), Thomas Jacob, 07:21
- [spf-discuss] Fwd: Google oddity (was: SPF), Julian Mehnle, 07:06
June 17, 2007
- Re: [spf-discuss] from the trenches: sender authentication relevance fading, DNSBLs and SpamAssassin rule, Scott Kitterman, 17:09
- Re: [spf-discuss] from the trenches: sender authentication relevance fading, DNSBLs and SpamAssassin rule, Meng Weng Wong, 16:07
- Re: [spf-discuss] from the trenches: sender authentication relevance fading, DNSBLs and SpamAssassin rule, Meng Weng Wong, 15:46
- [spf-discuss] from the trenches: sender authentication relevance fading, DNSBLs and SpamAssassin rule, David Lawless, 14:40
June 13, 2007
- Re: [spf-discuss] domain whitelists?, Stuart D. Gathman, 13:06
- Re: [spf-discuss] domain whitelists?, william(at)elan.net, 12:24
- [spf-discuss] domain whitelists?, Meng Weng Wong, 12:09
- Re: [spf-discuss] Need some help understanding this situation, Scott Kitterman, 05:42
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Need some help understanding this situation, Per Jessen, 01:11
- [spf-discuss] Re: Need some help understanding this situation, Julian Mehnle, 00:58
- Re: [spf-discuss] Need some help understanding this situation, Per Jessen, 00:47
- Re: [spf-discuss] Need some help understanding this situation, Graham Beneke, 00:09