[spf-discuss] Re: [spf-devel] Upcoming new test-suite release -- please

On Thu, 6 Dec 2007, Stuart D. Gathman wrote:

> +  e5a.example.com:
> +    - SPF: v=spf1 a:museum
>
> This seems to be not redundant.  However, it seems unintuitive to me that 
> example..com must be ignored, but museum gets a permerr.
How about this case:

Result: pass ?

e5b.example.com:
  - SPF: v=spf1 a:museum.

-- 
              Stuart D. Gathman <stuart(_at_)bmsi(_dot_)com>
    Business Management Systems Inc.  Phone: 703 591-0911 Fax: 703 591-6154
"Confutatis maledictis, flammis acribus addictis" - background song for
a Microsoft sponsored "Where do you want to go from here?" commercial.

-------------------------------------------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org
Archives: http://v2.listbox.com/member/archive/735/=now
RSS Feed: http://v2.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/735/
Modify Your Subscription: 
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?member_id=2183229&id_secret=73259337-c20bff
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com