SPF Discuss (date)
December 28, 2007
- [spf-discuss] Re: Google NOT rejecting on SPF Fail., Frank Ellermann, 17:43
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Google NOT rejecting on SPF Fail., Daryl C. W. O'Shea, 16:15
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Google NOT rejecting on SPF Fail., Stuart D. Gathman, 15:20
- [spf-discuss] Re: Google NOT rejecting on SPF Fail., Frank Ellermann, 13:02
- [spf-discuss] Re: Google NOT rejecting on SPF Fail., Frank Ellermann, 12:55
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Google NOT rejecting on SPF Fail., Terry Fielder, 11:44
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Google NOT rejecting on SPF Fail., Steven F Siirila, 08:53
- [spf-discuss] Re: Google NOT rejecting on SPF Fail., Julian Mehnle, 08:41
- [spf-discuss] Re: Google NOT rejecting on SPF Fail., Julian Mehnle, 08:41
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Google NOT rejecting on SPF Fail., Steven F Siirila, 08:32
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Google NOT rejecting on SPF Fail., ram, 05:57
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Google NOT rejecting on SPF Fail., Terry Fielder, 05:50
- [spf-discuss] Re: Google NOT rejecting on SPF Fail., Julian Mehnle, 04:42
- [spf-discuss] Re: Google NOT rejecting on SPF Fail., David MacQuigg, 03:40
December 23, 2007
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Google not rejecting on SPF Fail?, David MacQuigg, 11:50
- [spf-discuss] Google NOT rejecting on SPF Fail., Julian Mehnle, 11:43
- [spf-discuss] Re: Google not rejecting on SPF Fail?, Julian Mehnle, 11:33
- Re: [spf-discuss] Google not rejecting on SPF Fail?, David MacQuigg, 10:47
- Re: [spf-discuss] Google not rejecting on SPF Fail?, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 06:30
- Re: [spf-discuss] Google not rejecting on SPF Fail?, David MacQuigg, 02:50
December 22, 2007
- [spf-discuss] SPF Mail Summary Report, spf-discuss, 22:01
- [spf-discuss] Google not rejecting on SPF Fail?, Julian Mehnle, 19:46
- [spf-discuss] Re: Google's SPF Record, Frank Ellermann, 17:10
- [spf-discuss] Re: Google's SPF Record, Julian Mehnle, 15:49
- [spf-discuss] Re: Google's SPF Record, Julian Mehnle, 15:10
- [spf-discuss] Re: Google's SPF Record, Frank Ellermann, 15:00
- [spf-discuss] Re: advice wrong, or is it?, Julian Mehnle, 14:45
- [spf-discuss] Re: Google's SPF Record, Julian Mehnle, 14:14
- [spf-discuss] SPF PASS spam is good (was:: advice wrong, or is it?), Frank Ellermann, 13:54
- [spf-discuss] Re: advice wrong, or is it?, Frank Ellermann, 13:35
- [spf-discuss] Re: Re: advice wrong, or is it?, Frank Ellermann, 13:25
- [spf-discuss] Re: Google's SPF Record, Frank Ellermann, 13:19
- [spf-discuss] Re: Re: advice wrong, or is it?, Frank Ellermann, 13:00
- [spf-discuss] Re: Re: advice wrong, or is it?, Frank Ellermann, 12:53
- [spf-discuss] Re: advice wrong, or is it?, Frank Ellermann, 12:32
- RE: [spf-discuss] Re: advice wrong, or is it?, Mark, 12:25
- [spf-discuss] Re: advice wrong, or is it?, Frank Ellermann, 12:19
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: advice wrong, or is it?, Terry Fielder, 06:14
- [spf-discuss] Google's SPF Record, David MacQuigg, 03:26
December 21, 2007
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: advice wrong, or is it?, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 19:05
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: advice wrong, or is it?, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 19:03
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: advice wrong, or is it?, Bill Adragna, 19:01
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: advice wrong, or is it?, Bill Adragna, 18:59
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: advice wrong, or is it?, Bill Adragna, 18:58
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: advice wrong, or is it?, David MacQuigg, 18:38
- [spf-discuss] Re: advice wrong, or is it?, Julian Mehnle, 18:08
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: advice wrong, or is it?, WebMaster, 16:11
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: advice wrong, or is it?, Daniel Taylor, 15:30
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: advice wrong, or is it?, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 15:13
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: advice wrong, or is it?, Gino Cerullo, 15:07
- [spf-discuss] Re: advice wrong, or is it?, Julian Mehnle, 14:59
- Re: [spf-discuss] Support: Anyone willing to take over?, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 14:56
- [spf-discuss] Re: advice wrong, or is it?, Julian Mehnle, 14:54
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: advice wrong, or is it?, David Woodhouse, 14:51
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: advice wrong, or is it?, Gino Cerullo, 14:45
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: advice wrong, or is it?, Bill Adragna, 14:38
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: advice wrong, or is it?, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 14:31
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: advice wrong, or is it?, David Woodhouse, 14:28
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: advice wrong, or is it?, David Woodhouse, 14:23
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: advice wrong, or is it?, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 14:20
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: advice wrong, or is it?, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 14:10
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: advice wrong, or is it?, David Woodhouse, 13:57
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: advice wrong, or is it?, Daniel Taylor, 13:51
- [spf-discuss] Re: advice wrong, or is it?, Julian Mehnle, 13:33
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: advice wrong, or is it?, David Woodhouse, 13:28
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: advice wrong, or is it?, WebMaster, 13:20
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: advice wrong, or is it?, Daniel Taylor, 13:03
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: advice wrong, or is it?, David Woodhouse, 12:04
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: advice wrong, or is it?, Daniel Taylor, 09:45
- [spf-discuss] Re: advice wrong, or is it?, Julian Mehnle, 07:38
- Re: [spf-discuss] advice wrong, or is it?, Ian Eiloart, 07:34
- [spf-discuss] Re: advice wrong, or is it?, Julian Mehnle, 07:25
- Re: [spf-discuss] advice wrong, or is it?, Bill Adragna, 07:24
- [spf-discuss] Re: advice wrong, or is it?, Julian Mehnle, 07:18
- Re: [spf-discuss] advice wrong, or is it?, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 07:15
- Re: [spf-discuss] advice wrong, or is it?, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 06:56
- Re: [spf-discuss] advice wrong, or is it?, Peter Bowyer, 03:06
- Re: [spf-discuss] advice wrong, or is it?, David Woodhouse, 02:09
December 20, 2007
- Re: [spf-discuss] Support: Anyone willing to take over?, WebMaster, 21:37
- Re: [spf-discuss] advice wrong, or is it?, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 20:29
- Re: [spf-discuss] advice wrong, or is it?, Scott Kitterman, 20:25
- [spf-discuss] Support: Anyone willing to take over?, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 20:20
- [spf-discuss] advice wrong, or is it?, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 19:56
December 10, 2007
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: SPF -all domain survey, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 19:04
- [spf-discuss] Re: SPF -all domain survey, Julian Mehnle, 18:32
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF -all domain survey, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 18:28
- [spf-discuss] Re: SPF -all domain survey, Frank Ellermann, 17:53
- [spf-discuss] Re: Upcoming new test-suite release, Julian Mehnle, 17:07
- [spf-discuss] Re: SPF -all domain survey, Julian Mehnle, 16:57
- [spf-discuss] Re: SPF -all domain survey, Julian Mehnle, 16:42
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF -all domain survey, Greg Hewgill, 15:44
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF -all domain survey, Scott Kitterman, 15:41
- RE: [spf-discuss] Re: Upcoming new test-suite release, Guy, 15:31
- RE: [spf-discuss] SPF -all domain survey, Guy, 15:22
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF -all domain survey, Stephan Seitz, 13:53
- [spf-discuss] Re: SPF -all domain survey, Frank Ellermann, 13:45
- [spf-discuss] Re: SPF -all domain survey, Frank Ellermann, 13:40
- [spf-discuss] Re: too long label, Frank Ellermann, 13:17
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF -all domain survey, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 12:45
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF -all domain survey, Stuart D. Gathman, 12:01
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF -all domain survey, Greg Hewgill, 11:49
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF -all domain survey, Greg Hewgill, 11:47
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF -all domain survey, Greg Hewgill, 11:45
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF -all domain survey, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 10:13
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF -all domain survey, Ian Eiloart, 09:27
- [spf-discuss] Re: SPF -all domain survey, Frank Ellermann, 08:05
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF -all domain survey, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 08:02
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF -all domain survey, Philip Gladstone, 06:41
- RE: [spf-discuss] SPF -all domain survey, Guy, 06:08
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF -all domain survey, Scott Kitterman, 05:52
- [spf-discuss] Re: SPF -all domain survey, Frank Ellermann, 02:29
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF -all domain survey, Stephan Seitz, 02:01
- [spf-discuss] SPF -all domain survey, Greg Hewgill, 01:32
December 09, 2007
- [spf-discuss] too long label, Stuart D. Gathman, 18:44
- [spf-discuss] Re: Upcoming new test-suite release, Julian Mehnle, 16:30
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Upcoming new test-suite release, Stuart D. Gathman, 15:02
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Upcoming new test-suite release, Terry Fielder, 06:47
- [spf-discuss] Re: Upcoming new test-suite release, Julian Mehnle, 05:35
December 06, 2007
- [spf-discuss] Re: Upcoming new test-suite release, Julian Mehnle, 15:53
- [spf-discuss] Re: [spf-devel] Re: Upcoming new test-suite release, Stuart D. Gathman, 15:14
- [spf-discuss] Re: Upcoming new test-suite release, Julian Mehnle, 15:03
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Upcoming new test-suite release, Stuart D. Gathman, 14:44
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: SPF Implementation issues, Philip Gladstone, 14:18
- [spf-discuss] Re: Upcoming new test-suite release, Julian Mehnle, 13:36
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: [spf-devel] Upcoming new test-suite release -- please review! (was: SPF Implementation issues), Stuart D. Gathman, 12:20
- [spf-discuss] Re: [spf-devel] Upcoming new test-suite release -- please review! (was: SPF Implementation issues), Stuart D. Gathman, 12:00
- [spf-discuss] Re: [spf-devel] Upcoming new test-suite release -- please review! (was: SPF Implementation issues), Stuart D. Gathman, 11:12
- [spf-discuss] Upcoming new test-suite release -- please review! (was: SPF Implementation issues), Julian Mehnle, 09:54
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: SPF Implementation issues, Scott Kitterman, 07:32
- [spf-discuss] Re: SPF Implementation issues, Julian Mehnle, 04:45