-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Stuart D. Gathman wrote:
On Thu, 6 Dec 2007, Julian Mehnle wrote:
e5b.example.com:
- SPF: v=spf1 a:museum.
What would be the point? "a:museum." is still a syntax error because
the trailing dot doesn't count. The grammar doesn't allow "museum."
for a <domain-spec>, just as it doesn't allow plain "museum".
Since this isn't obvious, there should be a test case for both (with
and without trailing dot).
But what are the chances of an implementation throwing PermError on
"a:museum" but not on "a:museum."?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFHWHEGwL7PKlBZWjsRAgM6AKDjAJtOfT12dEGtx1AUgKtBB0IWSgCg3tCD
igT8geUkz8rMqSTIK/DV7Tk=
=2znC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-------------------------------------------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org
Archives: http://v2.listbox.com/member/archive/735/=now
RSS Feed: http://v2.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/735/
Modify Your Subscription:
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?member_id=2183229&id_secret=73353195-29efa5
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com