-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Julian Mehnle wrote:
Frank Ellermann wrote:
I think [Google] reject FAIL, [...]
See also <http://www.openspf.org/Frank_Ellermann/Google>, if it's
generally interesting I could move it to an "ordinary" openspf page.
Before we consider that, how can we be sure that the rejection demons-
trated on that page is actually due to an SPF Fail?
Here's an indication to the contrary from 2007-12-03:
http://groups.google.com/group/Gmail-ABCs/browse_thread/thread/86ce42bd8ddf2bd0/dbc3e8c800be5cbe?lnk=gst&q=
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFHbZQIwL7PKlBZWjsRAqOVAKDXNQDZyD6K5ywDAENRUp+9aS/Q1ACdFoCZ
j3Grug7gsF/dETfjmbIWZMQ=
=IvZM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-------------------------------------------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org
Archives: http://v2.listbox.com/member/archive/735/=now
RSS Feed: http://v2.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/735/
Modify Your Subscription:
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?member_id=2183229&id_secret=78868164-cab6a9
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com