At 06:30 PM 12/23/2007 +0000, you wrote:
David MacQuigg wrote:
One other surprise I just noticed. Google's Received-SPF header is
*below* their Received header!
[...]
We had a thorough discussion of proper header order a year ago
http://www.emaildiscussions.com/showthread.php?t=46632, and ended up
changing our Border Patrol MTA to place these headers as expected by
most "header readers" (not in strict chronological order).
For the record, section 7 of RFC 4408 explicitly also recommends that the
R-SPF: header field be prepended _above_ the corresponding Received:
field:
| The Received-SPF header field is a trace field (see RFC 2822 Section
| 3.6.7) and SHOULD be prepended to the existing header, above the
| Received: field that is generated by the SMTP receiver.
Our Border Patrol MTA is now in compliance. Looks like Google is not.
-- Dave
-------------------------------------------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org
Archives: http://v2.listbox.com/member/archive/735/=now
RSS Feed: http://v2.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/735/
Modify Your Subscription:
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?member_id=2183229&id_secret=78983626-23b03e
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com