Re: [spf-discuss] Re: advice wrong, or is it?

David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-12-21 at 14:15 +0000, Julian Mehnle wrote:
> > What you don't seem to get is that SPF is an opt-in system.  If YOU don't 
> > want YOUR mail to be subject to that clear redefinition, don't publish an 
> > SPF record for YOUR domain.  It's that simple.
> And if you DO want your mail to be subject to that redefinition, don't
> send it by SMTP to mail hosts which are only going to behave like they
> have for more than the last two decades, and violate your bogus
> assumptions.
Forwarding my e-mail without my permission or accounting for my SPF
record to a strict SPF checking host will result in a delivery failure.
Congratulations, you just denied yourself my e-mail.

Yay you.

-- 
Daniel Taylor          VP Operations            Vocal Laboratories, Inc.
dtaylor(_at_)vocalabs(_dot_)com   http://www.vocalabs.com/        
(952)941-6580x203

-------------------------------------------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org
Archives: http://v2.listbox.com/member/archive/735/=now
RSS Feed: http://v2.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/735/
Modify Your Subscription: 
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?member_id=2183229&id_secret=78575837-cbfa26
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature