On Thursday 20 December 2007 21:53, Alex van den Bogaerdt wrote:
Hi,
Would anyone know why google would say the following?
<quote class="wrong">Publishing an SPF record that lacks
include:aspmx.googlemail.com or specifying -all instead of ~all may result
in delivery problems.</quote>
Note: they say "~all" is good, "-all" is not.
I found this here:
http://www.google.com/support/a/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=33786
It depends on what your goal is. If you want to deter spammers from using
your domains, then -all is a good idea.
Scott K
-------------------------------------------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org
Archives: http://v2.listbox.com/member/archive/735/=now
RSS Feed: http://v2.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/735/
Modify Your Subscription:
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?member_id=2183229&id_secret=78297431-fdbf52
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com