spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Forwarder whitelisting reloaded

2008-01-16 04:26:13
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 04:15:33AM +0100, Frank Ellermann wrote:
Alex van den Bogaerdt wrote:

Why would there be a difference between:
 
"... MX --> Forwarder ==> MX --> Recipient"
and
"... MX --> Internal_relay1 --> Internal_relay2 --> Recipient"
?

The number of admins (ADMDs) is different.

To which I say: "so what" ...

The number of admins (ADMDs) is different.  In the 2nd
scenario it's easy to say "you broke it, you fix it" ;-)

... because I disagree. This is also possible in the first scenario.
In both cases it is the recipient (or his employer, or his ISP, or...)
who screwed up.

The messages was delivered to "MX". That worked.

That is why my message read:

[...]
Whatever happens to this message is now under control of the recipient,
and problems occuring from that moment on are the recipient's problems.

Why would there be a difference between:
[...]

-------------------------------------------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org
Archives: http://v2.listbox.com/member/archive/735/=now
RSS Feed: http://v2.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/735/
Modify Your Subscription: 
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?member_id=2183229&id_secret=86374181-d5307a
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>