spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

[spf-discuss] Re: Strong SPF assertions

2008-01-30 12:36:53
Greg Hewgill wrote:

I probably should go back and do that.

Yes, domains without MX (first approximation) or more
precisely with neither MX nor an SMTP server at their
IPs could ignore spam / forgery / backscatter issues.

Maybe limit it to "have MX" and/or "have SPF" if you
want to get rid of "irrelevant" (wrt SMTP) domains.

 Frank

-------------------------------------------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org
Archives: http://v2.listbox.com/member/archive/735/=now
RSS Feed: http://v2.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/735/
Modify Your Subscription: 
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?member_id=2183229&id_secret=91714122-85573e
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com