| 
 
 Re: [xsl] Referring to stylesheet itself, possible in XSLT 1.0, but how in XSLT 2.0?
2006-10-17 02:10:24
 
Andrew Welch wrote:
 
What error is being thrown? Saying "it doesnt work" or "it throws an
error" is pretty unhelpful without the associated error.
 
 
 I understand, but it really just said "Transformation failed". Without 
any descriptive error, warning or whatever. Doing the same in XSLT 1.0, 
it waited a bit longer, apparently trying to retrieve the document on 
the xml:base location, and then returned the empty string.
 
document-uri(document(''))
...should be fine.  How are you running the transform?  If you are
loading the stylesheet as a stream then its uri will be lost, in which
case call setSystemId() on the Source.
 
 That's an interesting gest. I have to look into it if we can apply that 
to our scenario.
 But from Michael's post, and the others, I think my best bet is to 
either get rid of xml:base, or to reverse-append it to the document('') 
function (which will be hard, considering that my xml:base="../..", 
loosing the path information).
-- Abel Braaksma
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--
 
 
| <Prev in Thread] | 
Current Thread | 
[Next in Thread>
 |  
- [xsl] Referring to stylesheet itself, possible in XSLT 1.0, but how in XSLT 2.0?, Abel Braaksma
- Re: [xsl] Referring to stylesheet itself, possible in XSLT 1.0, but how in XSLT 2.0?, Dimitre Novatchev
 
- RE: [xsl] Referring to stylesheet itself, possible in XSLT 1.0, but how in XSLT 2.0?, Michael Kay
 
- Re: [xsl] Referring to stylesheet itself, possible in XSLT 1.0, but how in XSLT 2.0?, Andrew Welch
- Re: [xsl] Referring to stylesheet itself, possible in XSLT 1.0, but how in XSLT 2.0?,
Abel Braaksma <=
- RE: [xsl] Referring to stylesheet itself, possible in XSLT 1.0, but how in XSLT 2.0?, Michael Kay
 - Re: [xsl] Referring to stylesheet itself, possible in XSLT 1.0, but how in XSLT 2.0?, Andrew Welch
 - RE: [xsl] Referring to stylesheet itself, possible in XSLT 1.0, but how in XSLT 2.0?, Michael Kay
 - Re: [xsl] Referring to stylesheet itself, possible in XSLT 1.0, but how in XSLT 2.0?, Andrew Welch
 
  
- Re: [xsl] Referring to stylesheet itself, possible in XSLT 1.0, but how in XSLT 2.0?, David Carlisle
 - Re: [xsl] Referring to stylesheet itself, possible in XSLT 1.0, but how in XSLT 2.0?, Abel Braaksma
 
  
  
- Re: [xsl] Referring to stylesheet itself, possible in XSLT 1.0, but how in XSLT 2.0?, Abel Braaksma
 - Re: [xsl] Referring to stylesheet itself, possible in XSLT 1.0, but how in XSLT 2.0?, Abel Braaksma
 - Re: [xsl] Referring to stylesheet itself, possible in XSLT 1.0, but how in XSLT 2.0?, David Carlisle
 - Re: [xsl] Referring to stylesheet itself, possible in XSLT 1.0, but how in XSLT 2.0?, Abel Braaksma
 
 
 |  
  
| Previous by Date:  | 
Re: [xsl] Referring to stylesheet itself, possible in XSLT 1.0, but how in XSLT 2.0?, Abel Braaksma | 
 
| Next by Date:  | 
Re: [xsl] [XSLT 2.0] Checking that an element's value has the desired datatype?, Andrew Welch | 
 
| Previous by Thread:  | 
Re: [xsl] Referring to stylesheet itself, possible in XSLT 1.0, but how in XSLT 2.0?, Andrew Welch | 
 
| Next by Thread:  | 
RE: [xsl] Referring to stylesheet itself, possible in XSLT 1.0, but how in XSLT 2.0?, Michael Kay | 
 
| Indexes:  | 
[Date]
[Thread]
[Top]
[All Lists] | 
 
 
 
 | 
 
 
 |