On 5/6/08, Andrew Welch <andrew(_dot_)j(_dot_)welch(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com> wrote:
...but that contradicts what you've said above
Please don't take my words literally. I was discussing possible options.
Indeed, I'm not proposing any changes, it's no big deal - just
pointing out (or perhaps looking for confirmation) that the xml schema
namespace could easily have been excluded by default.
I think, pros and cons of this weigh equally. To my opinion, this
cannot be classified as a bug in the spec. I also think, cost of
providing this enhancement are quite high than the benefits.
--
Regards,
Mukul Gandhi
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--