I did understand you mean the first node, not the first attribute.
Comprehension check: Does this at all contradict what Darcy wrote? I don't
think it does...but just making sure.
--- On Wed, 9/3/08, Andrew Welch
<andrew(_dot_)j(_dot_)welch(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com> wrote:
From: Andrew Welch <andrew(_dot_)j(_dot_)welch(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com>
Subject: Re: [xsl] xslt 1.0 vs xslt 2.0 problem
To: xsl-list(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com
Date: Wednesday, September 3, 2008, 11:17 AM
I wrote:
//A[contains((B/@a[1]), 'foo')]
but meant:
//A[contains((B/@a)[1], 'foo')]
...but hopefully you got the idea!
--
Andrew Welch
http://andrewjwelch.com
Kernow: http://kernowforsaxon.sf.net/
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--