Hermann Stamm-Wilbrandt wrote:
Same output (at bottom, besides XML-declaration).
Did run this on a 2.2GHz i7 processor, while naxos.xsl was running java
process had between 160% and 224% CPU utilization, which is reflected in
real vs user time.
Promising! Using enough cores, naxos will be faster than saxon. Sorry, Mr Kay.
As next step I wanted to see, whether naxos.xsl can run naxos.xsl ... :-)
But I got stopped at this very littly sample, further efforts seem
worthless:
[...]
<xsl:copy-of select="."/>
According to the documentation, copy-of is not yet implemented.
But naxos doesn't make use of copy-of !?
$ grep "<[^:]*:copy-of" naxos/*.xsl | wc -l
0
Best regards,
Markus
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--