David et al,
Brilliant! I just *love* this thought of XSLT with more readable syntax.
Not everyone can afford Oxygen, etc., and even though an IDE makes typing
easier, it doesn't help with reading it much (other than the folding). I've
been using XSLT for years, and my eyes still glaze over reading other people's
code.
How about something like what Groovy did for Java?
--Rich
Richard Fozzard, Computer Scientist
Geospatial Metadata at NGDC: http://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/metadata
Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences (CIRES)
Univ. Colorado & NOAA National Geophysical Data Center, Enterprise Data Systems
325 S. Broadway, Skaggs 1B-305, Boulder, CO 80305
Office: 303-497-6487, Cell: 303-579-5615, Email:
richard(_dot_)fozzard(_at_)noaa(_dot_)gov
David Rudel said the following on 03/27/2014 11:24 AM:
I wonder how hard it would be to create some limited "Pretty XSLT"
variant that used more eye-friendly syntax and was converted to real
XSLT through parsing.
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--